Billionaires in Global Philanthropy: A Decade of the Giving Pledge

This article analyzes the Giving Pledge, initiated in 2010 by Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffett, a decade after its inception. It reveals that signatories are predominantly white, male, and US-based billionaires, with tech billionaires being a younger, wealthier subgroup. The study found that pledge letters emphasize education and health. Common motivations for giving include a desire to make a difference, give back, personal fulfillment, and early socialization into philanthropy. While the Giving Pledge aims to increase philanthropic giving among the wealthy, its voluntary nature and modest commitment make assessing its global significance and impact challenging.

Race and Place-based Philanthropy: Learnings from Funders Focused on Equitable Impact

This report, based on interviews with 12 place-based funders, provides insights into shifting towards equity-led giving. It highlights crucial practices such as internal mindset shifts, incorporating lived experiences into strategic planning, and developing inclusive peer-learning cohorts. The report notes that the COVID-19 pandemic and the racial justice reckoning significantly spurred funders to prioritize power dynamics and racial justice more intentionally in their philanthropic endeavors, aiming for more equitable and impactful outcomes in communities.

New Bridgespan Group Survey Sheds Light on a Growing Trend toward Philanthropic Collaboration, Highlighting the Practice's Potential to Fuel Social Change

This Bridgespan blog reports on a survey revealing a significant rise in philanthropic collaboration, particularly pooled funding and funder partnerships. The survey data highlights the perceived effectiveness of these collaborative approaches, with 90% of respondents stating their collaborative work met or exceeded outcome expectations. It also identifies common barriers to collaboration and offers recommendations for funders to leverage collective action. The article emphasizes how collaboratives can pool diverse resources to tackle ambitious social challenges and drive systemic change more efficiently.

Race and Place-based Philanthropy: When Funders Source the Wisdom of the Communities They Serve

Bielak et al. detail how funders can effectively prioritize community-led insights by integrating lived experiences into leadership roles, advisory councils, and design processes. They provide examples from initiatives in Seattle, Chicago, the Bay Area, and Detroit, underscoring the importance of building trust through sustained engagement and genuine two-way dialogue. The report advocates for a participatory approach where communities are not just recipients but active partners in philanthropic endeavors. This strategy aims to ensure that funding decisions and program designs are truly responsive to the needs and wisdom of the communities they serve, fostering more equitable and impactful outcomes.

Race and Place-based Philanthropy: To Advance Racial Equity and Justice, Funders Begin by Looking Inward

The authors emphasize that effective racial equity work in philanthropy must start with internal reflection and transformation. They discuss how funders can address pervasive white supremacy culture within their organizations, fund healing practices for staff and grantees, and redesign asset management strategies. Funders shared insights suggesting that internal healing and organizational transformation are foundational to achieving externally equitable practices. This report advocates for a deep, introspective approach, arguing that genuine systemic change requires philanthropies to first confront and dismantle internal biases and ingrained practices before they can effectively promote racial equity and justice in the communities they serve.

Race and Place-based Philanthropy: Partnering with Public Institutions, Collaborating but also Advocating

This Bridgespan report details how place-based funders engage with public institutions as "critical friends," supporting policy pilots and advocacy initiatives. It profiles funders in cities like Atlanta, Miami, and New Orleans, highlighting the delicate balance between collaboration and advocacy necessary to drive structural change. The report emphasizes that effective place-based philanthropy involves not only providing financial support but also actively engaging in policy discussions and advocating for systemic reforms that address the root causes of social inequities. This collaborative yet assertive approach aims to maximize philanthropic impact by leveraging public sector partnerships for lasting societal benefit.

Reflections on philanthropy and organizing in the United States

Frey explores the evolving dynamic between philanthropy and social movement organizing in the U.S., drawing insights from interviews with activists and funders. The article highlights the inherent tensions between flexible, trust-based financial support and the often-rigid metrics imposed by philanthropic institutions. It advocates for practices that genuinely honor grassroots leadership and prioritize systemic change over superficial interventions. The research suggests that a more effective philanthropic approach involves empowering community-led initiatives, recognizing their deep understanding of local needs, and providing support that adapts to the organic nature of social movements rather than imposing predefined outcomes, fostering authentic, sustainable impact.

Race and Place-based Philanthropy: Building Community Power from Within

Bielak et al. advocate for race-conscious, place-based philanthropic strategies that empower local leadership and build community power from within. They outline actionable practices such as providing flexible funding, cultivating trust-based relationships, and developing community-defined metrics for success. The report aims to shift power dynamics towards residents, fostering long-term community health and agency rather than perpetuating traditional top-down approaches. By emphasizing equity and community-led initiatives, the authors propose a transformative model for philanthropy that supports self-determination and sustainable impact in historically marginalized communities.

Releasing the Potential of Philanthropic Collaborations

Powell, Morfit & John explore how funders can form effective partnerships with peers, nonprofits, and public entities to accelerate social impact. They outline five key design principles: shared goals, clear governance, flexible resources, trust-based practices, and continuous learning. Supported by case studies, the report argues that such collaborations can unlock greater collective impact, allowing funders to source nonprofits more effectively, address systemic challenges, and support leaders with lived experience. It notes a surge in collaborative giving platforms, many of which prioritize equity, justice, and diverse leadership, signaling a significant shift in philanthropic practices.

Reimagining Global Philanthropy

Bowman & Wilcox critically analyze the shortcomings of Western-led global philanthropy and advocate for a paradigm shift towards empowering local leaders. They propose a "community-bank-style model" that supports grassroots innovation, with external partners adopting background roles. Drawing on pilot programs in Brazil, the authors argue this approach fosters transformative impact, strengthens local ownership, and enhances cost-effectiveness. The book challenges conventional top-down philanthropic strategies, promoting decentralized, community-driven development to address global challenges more equitably and sustainably, thereby "reimagining" the future of international giving by shifting power and resources to the ground.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.