Fixing Fictions Through Blended Finance: the Entrepreneurial Ensemble and Risk Interpretation in the Blue Economy

This article explores how blended finance can address challenges within the Blue Economy, particularly focusing on entrepreneurial ensembles and their interpretation of risk. It investigates how innovative financial structures facilitate sustainable development by bridging financing gaps for ocean-related initiatives. The research delves into the dynamics of risk perception and management among diverse stakeholders, highlighting how blended finance instruments can mobilise capital for environmentally and socially impactful projects in the marine sector.

The Geographies of Social Finance: Poverty Regulation Through the ‘invisible Heart’ of Markets

This article critically examines the emerging field of social finance, arguing that it represents a form of poverty regulation embedded within financialised capitalism. It proposes that social finance reframes private profit-making as a force for public good, attempting to resolve capitalism’s inherent contradictions from within. The paper outlines a typology of social finance forms and suggests a geographical research agenda, emphasizing that practitioners’ simplistic geographical framings obscure the complex spatial dynamics constituting this emerging financial marketplace and its logic of poverty regulation.

Assessing Mission Drift at Venture Capital Impact Investors

This article examines how impact investing venture capital firms navigate the inherent tension between their social missions and prevailing market pressures. Using an institutional logics perspective, it analyses the competing demands from the social sector, which prioritizes measurable impact, and the market sector, which emphasizes financial returns. Through a detailed case study of a US-based impact VC firm, the study identifies the specific hybrid practices and organizational behaviors these firms adopt to balance these conflicting logics. It highlights the constant negotiation required to prevent “mission drift” and successfully integrate dual objectives.

Increasing Positive Climate Impact by Combining Anti Consumption and Consumption Changes with Impact Investing

This article proposes a novel approach to climate change mitigation by combining anti-consumption and consumption changes with impact investing. It addresses the risk of rebound effects, where money saved from reduced consumption leads to GHG emissions elsewhere. The study develops a method to calculate potential “double impacts” by ensuring saved funds are invested in climate-mitigating actions. It quantifies GHG emission reduction potentials for various anti-consumption strategies and impact investments, highlighting the need for this dual consideration.

The Architecture of Social Finance

This chapter explores the foundational elements and structural design of social finance. It discusses the various components that constitute the social finance ecosystem, including different investment vehicles like Social Impact Bonds (SIBs), and the broader marketplace. The piece delves into how these elements interact to channel capital towards social and environmental objectives. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the conceptual and practical architecture underpinning social and sustainable finance, positioning it within the broader landscape of finance.

Annual Reports: Dfi Working Group on Blended Concessional Finance for Private Sector Projects

IFC’s annual blended finance reports synthesize data on partnerships, instruments, and impact across development sectors. They detail financing volumes, geographic distribution, blended vehicles, and lessons learned from private sector engagement. The reports serve as institutional frameworks for promoting private sector involvement in development missions, providing transparency on risk sharing and concessional commitments to mobilise capital effectively for sustainable development.

The Impact of Impact Investing

This paper theoretically and empirically assesses the impact of socially responsible investing, particularly divestment in secondary markets. It argues that while direct investments in primary markets and increased voting rights through engagement are likely to be effective, divestment often has negligible real impact on company operations. The analysis provides a formula to calculate the change in cost of capital from divestment, concluding that a substantial effect would require an unrealistically high proportion of socially conscious capital. Empirical evidence from index inclusions and exclusions corroborates these findings, suggesting that current divestment levels yield minimal influence on firm decisions.

Integrating the Social Dimension in Climate Transition Under G20’s Sustainable Finance Working Group

This paper discusses the integration of the social dimension within climate transition efforts, specifically under the G20’s Sustainable Finance Working Group. It highlights the importance of aligning climate finance with social objectives to ensure a just and equitable transition. The author explores how sustainable development goals can be advanced by incorporating social considerations into climate finance strategies, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches that address both environmental and social challenges.

The Allure of Finance: Social Impact Investing and the Challenges of Assetization in Financialised Capitalism

This paper analyses how social impact investing transforms social welfare funding from grants into return-bearing assets within financialised capitalism. Through a qualitative case study in Britain, it demonstrates how proponents utilise a collective action frame to foster “collective ignorance” regarding the extractive nature of assetization. Despite financial power, success hinges on the discursive frame’s credibility and salience. The research reveals how the allure of finance is used to reconfigure social goods into assets, highlighting the inherent tensions and challenges in this process.

Alternative to Private Finance of the Welfare State: a Global Analysis of Social Impact Bond, Pay-for-success and Development Impact Bond Projects

This report analyses global Social Impact Bond (SIB), Pay-for-Success, and Development Impact Bond (DIB) schemes. It details investor returns (ranging from 15–30%), outlines stakeholder roles, governance models, and assesses scalability across various global cases. The study reviews the benefits, risks, and adoption trends of these innovative financing mechanisms, providing insights into their potential to address social challenges and leverage private capital for public good.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.