The Architecture of Social Finance

This chapter explores the foundational elements and structural design of social finance. It discusses the various components that constitute the social finance ecosystem, including different investment vehicles like Social Impact Bonds (SIBs), and the broader marketplace. The piece delves into how these elements interact to channel capital towards social and environmental objectives. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the conceptual and practical architecture underpinning social and sustainable finance, positioning it within the broader landscape of finance.

Annual Reports: Dfi Working Group on Blended Concessional Finance for Private Sector Projects

IFC’s annual blended finance reports synthesize data on partnerships, instruments, and impact across development sectors. They detail financing volumes, geographic distribution, blended vehicles, and lessons learned from private sector engagement. The reports serve as institutional frameworks for promoting private sector involvement in development missions, providing transparency on risk sharing and concessional commitments to mobilise capital effectively for sustainable development.

The Impact of Impact Investing

This paper theoretically and empirically assesses the impact of socially responsible investing, particularly divestment in secondary markets. It argues that while direct investments in primary markets and increased voting rights through engagement are likely to be effective, divestment often has negligible real impact on company operations. The analysis provides a formula to calculate the change in cost of capital from divestment, concluding that a substantial effect would require an unrealistically high proportion of socially conscious capital. Empirical evidence from index inclusions and exclusions corroborates these findings, suggesting that current divestment levels yield minimal influence on firm decisions.

Integrating the Social Dimension in Climate Transition Under G20’s Sustainable Finance Working Group

This paper discusses the integration of the social dimension within climate transition efforts, specifically under the G20’s Sustainable Finance Working Group. It highlights the importance of aligning climate finance with social objectives to ensure a just and equitable transition. The author explores how sustainable development goals can be advanced by incorporating social considerations into climate finance strategies, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches that address both environmental and social challenges.

The Allure of Finance: Social Impact Investing and the Challenges of Assetization in Financialised Capitalism

This paper analyses how social impact investing transforms social welfare funding from grants into return-bearing assets within financialised capitalism. Through a qualitative case study in Britain, it demonstrates how proponents utilise a collective action frame to foster “collective ignorance” regarding the extractive nature of assetization. Despite financial power, success hinges on the discursive frame’s credibility and salience. The research reveals how the allure of finance is used to reconfigure social goods into assets, highlighting the inherent tensions and challenges in this process.

Alternative to Private Finance of the Welfare State: a Global Analysis of Social Impact Bond, Pay-for-success and Development Impact Bond Projects

This report analyses global Social Impact Bond (SIB), Pay-for-Success, and Development Impact Bond (DIB) schemes. It details investor returns (ranging from 15–30%), outlines stakeholder roles, governance models, and assesses scalability across various global cases. The study reviews the benefits, risks, and adoption trends of these innovative financing mechanisms, providing insights into their potential to address social challenges and leverage private capital for public good.

The ‘stuff’ of Markets: an Institutional Analysis of Impact Investing

This paper examines market building and emergence through an institutional lens, focusing on the “impact investing” market. It investigates how institutional ordering and isomorphic pressures develop among diverse actors, using the Australian government’s efforts to construct a national social finance market as an empirical setting. The findings underscore the critical role of materiality—beyond categories and social skills—in shaping shared meaning, collective identities, and boundaries within nascent markets. Materials are shown to be essential for coordinating and structuring fields, and thus markets.

Social Finance as Cultural Evolution, Transmission Bias, and Market Dynamics

This case study from PNAS examines social finance through the lens of cultural evolution, transmission bias, and market dynamics. It explores how social interactions and behavioral economics influence financial decision-making and market outcomes in the context of social finance. The paper likely delves into the evolutionary aspects of financial behaviors and the mechanisms through which cultural norms and biases are transmitted, shaping the landscape of social finance.

The Mythology of the Social Impact Bond. a Critical Assessment From a Concerned Observer

This paper critically assesses the social impact bond (SIB), highlighting its evolution from a risk-transfer mechanism for social program delivery to a scheme where the state increasingly de-risks private investors, particularly in the United Kingdom. It questions the underlying myths of public sector savings, financial innovation, and evidence-based policy often associated with SIBs, providing a concerned observer’s perspective on their actual impact and the transformation of social services under payment-by-results models.

Sustainable Investing : Shaping the Future of Finance

This report examines the growing trend of sustainable investing and its potential to reshape the financial industry. It highlights the exponential growth of assets under management with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) mandates and discusses challenges like integrating sustainability into passively managed portfolios. The paper projects a near 100% ESG integration in fund management by 2036, driven by increasing client demand and the recognition of climate risk. It also emphasizes the role of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in guiding investment decisions and the need for financial innovation to address global sustainability challenges.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.