Promoting Research on Global Chinese Philanthropy: an Introduction to the Special Issue

This article serves as an introduction to a special issue dedicated to promoting research on global Chinese philanthropy. It highlights the growing importance and unique characteristics of philanthropic activities among Chinese communities worldwide. The author discusses the complexities of Chinese philanthropy, including its diverse forms, motivations, and evolving governance structures, both within mainland China and among the diaspora. The piece underscores the need for more in-depth academic inquiry to understand the global impact and future trajectory of Chinese philanthropic engagement.

Philanthropy: A decade of change?

Baker, Barraket & Elmes assess shifts in philanthropy over the 2010s, noting rises in strategic giving, data orientation, digital engagement, and growing roles of intermediaries. They discuss impacts of regulation, foundation practice, and social innovation on sector evolution across Australia and beyond. The article provides a comprehensive overview of how the philanthropic landscape has transformed, highlighting key drivers of change and their implications for future practice. It underscores the increasing sophistication and diversification of philanthropic approaches in a rapidly evolving global context.

Providing foundations: Philanthropy, global policy and administration

Jung & Harrow trace the emergence of global philanthropic foundations as actors in policy and aid administration. They critique funding models, accountability regimes, and argue for more equitable partnerships and transparent governance in global philanthropy. The article emphasizes the need for a critical examination of the power dynamics inherent in international philanthropic endeavors, advocating for practices that foster greater equity and accountability in the global aid landscape. It also highlights the growing influence of foundations in shaping global policy agendas.

Philanthropy and Civil Society: Comparative Perspectives on Private Solutions to Public Problems

Appe explores how philanthropic actors engage as private solutions to public problems, offering a comparative analysis across various countries. The paper highlights diverse hybrid governance forms and varying state-philanthropy relationships, examining their implications for civil society capacity and policy influence. It sheds light on the multifaceted ways in which private giving intersects with public needs and governance structures globally.

Philanthropy for Impact – Uttar Pradesh

This paper serves as a development brief on Uttar Pradesh, offering a comprehensive snapshot of the state’s progress across economic, social, and environmental parameters. It highlights Uttar Pradesh's development performance in comparison to other Indian states, focusing on education, health, nutrition, WASH, livelihood, environment, and women empowerment. Beyond examining trends, gaps, assets, and intra-state disparities, the paper also provides insights into the solution ecosystem and development funding flows from government and CSR, aiming to guide philanthropic funders in identifying prominent gaps and collaboration opportunities.

Philanthropy for Impact – Rajasthan

This development brief provides a comprehensive overview of Rajasthan’s socio-economic landscape, encompassing crucial sectors like health, education, nutrition, livelihood, WASH, environment, and gender. It meticulously identifies development gaps and sheds light on philanthropic funding trends, pinpointing district-level disparities. The report also highlights innovative collaborative solutions, such as impact bonds, specifically in girl-child education and healthcare, to address these challenges and foster positive change across the state.

Philanthrocapitalism: Promoting Global Health but Failing Planetary Health

Butler critiques philanthrocapitalism's dominant focus on global health, primarily driven by foundations like the Gates and Wellcome Trust. He argues that their market-driven strategies, while addressing specific diseases, often neglect critical planetary health concerns. Despite some ecological funding, these foundations continue significant fossil fuel investments. Butler contends that while these actors may partially counter neoliberal health decline, they inadequately address systemic environmental risks, posing long-term challenges to holistic well-being.

Improving Social and Economic Outcomes: The Value of Data Quality at the Federal Level

This article examines how high data quality drives better social and economic outcomes, providing case studies from government agencies and recommending improvements to data quality practices. It highlights the importance of maintaining high-quality data in driving effective social programs and policies. The article discusses how improved data quality leads to better targeting of resources, more effective interventions, and measurable improvements in social and economic conditions. It also outlines strategies for enhancing data quality, ensuring that governments and organizations can rely on accurate data to make informed decisions that drive positive societal impact.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.