New foundations, the new philanthropy and sectoral 'blending'in international development cooperation

This paper discusses the emergence of new private foundations and blended models in international development. It explores how foundations channel resources through sectoral cooperation blends—public, private, philanthropic—examining benefits, accountability challenges, and implications for aid effectiveness. The report highlights the evolving landscape of development finance, emphasizing the opportunities and complexities inherent in multi-stakeholder collaborations aimed at achieving global development goals.

Philanthropy and accountability in Europe

Whitman analyzes European philanthropic foundations' accountability mechanisms, highlighting the balance between autonomy and legitimacy. He explores regulatory frameworks, transparency practices, and pressures for public oversight, suggesting that European philanthropy requires tailored statutes to ensure it meets both societal needs and donor freedoms. The article underscores the importance of robust governance structures that uphold public trust while allowing foundations the flexibility to innovate and pursue their missions effectively.

Philanthropy and the third sector in Mexico: The enabling environment and its limitations

Layton examines why Mexico's third sector remains underdeveloped. He argues that weak legal, fiscal, accountability, capacity, resource, and cultural frameworks constrain civil society growth. Applying a comprehensive "enabling-environment" model, the author recommends reforms across regulatory, institutional, and cultural domains. These reforms are crucial to strengthen Mexico’s nonprofit and philanthropic ecosystems, fostering a more robust and effective civil society that can address social needs.

Philanthropy and mistakes: An untapped resource

Giloth and Gewirtz argue that systematically sharing mistakes is an underutilized yet powerful strategy for philanthropic learning and accountability. They distinguish between "constructive" and "non-constructive" errors, positing that thoughtful reflection on failures fosters adaptability and prevents more significant, costlier setbacks. The authors strongly advocate for integrating routine mistake-sharing into the core culture of foundations. This practice, they contend, not only enhances organizational effectiveness but also builds a more transparent and resilient philanthropic sector capable of continuous improvement.

Philanthropy 2.0

"Philanthropy 2.0" by Evgeny Morozov explores how technology is profoundly transforming the landscape of philanthropy, enabling more transparent and data-driven approaches to giving. The article highlights both the immense potential and the inherent challenges of utilizing digital tools to effectively address complex global social issues. It discusses how online platforms and data analytics can enhance efficiency and accountability, while also considering ethical implications and the digital divide.

Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility

Halme and Laurila categorize corporate social responsibility (CSR) into three distinct approaches—philanthropy, integration, and innovation—and analyze their respective financial and societal performance. Their empirical study reveals that while philanthropic CSR yields limited societal impact, integrated and innovative approaches consistently correlate with stronger, more significant outcomes. This research underscores the importance of embedding CSR deeply within business operations rather than treating it as a separate charitable activity for maximum impact.

"Building a culture": The construction and evolution of venture philanthropy as a new organizational field

This article investigates the construction and evolution of "venture philanthropy" as a new organizational field and professional culture since its emergence in the mid-1990s. Based on qualitative research of venture philanthropy organizations and their leaders, it suggests that while the dot-com boom was a catalyst, the field’s diffusion depended on opinion leaders strategically defining and legitimating the new model. The study highlights the importance of cultural fit and network institutionalization, alongside challenges like implementation difficulties and business-nonprofit culture clashes, which have driven its evolution.

Young Professionals and Philanthropy

This research report presents findings from seven teams of young professionals who collaborated with non-profit and donor organizations. The study addresses two key questions: the role of philanthropy in retaining young professionals in the Boston region, and how young professionals can utilize their leadership skills and organizational resources to forge successful philanthropic partnerships. It compiles their experiences and insights, offering valuable perspectives on youth engagement in corporate citizenship and cross-sector collaboration within the philanthropic landscape.

Venturing into venture philanthropy: Is more sustainable health and medical research funding possible through venture philanthropy and social entrepreneurship?

This article explores the potential of venture philanthropy and social entrepreneurship to create more sustainable funding models for health and medical research. It examines how the principles of venture capital, adapted for philanthropic purposes, could offer innovative solutions to the perennial challenge of securing long-term financial support for research initiatives. The author investigates whether a more entrepreneurial approach to philanthropy can not only provide capital but also foster efficiency, accountability, and impact in the health research sector. This paper contributes to discussions on diversifying funding streams and enhancing the sustainability of critical research endeavors.

Thinking inside the neoliberal box: The micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy

This article critically examines the micro-politics of agro-food philanthropy within a neoliberal framework. It delves into how philanthropic initiatives in the agricultural and food sectors may inadvertently reinforce existing power structures and market-driven ideologies. The research likely explores the subtle ways in which funding and programmatic decisions within this space can shape policy, agricultural practices, and food systems, often reflecting and perpetuating neoliberal tenets. It encourages a critical reflection on the broader societal implications of philanthropic interventions in agriculture, urging consideration of alternative approaches that challenge dominant paradigms and promote equitable outcomes.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.