This article addresses the increasing demand for robust data and evidence in impact investing to genuinely demonstrate social outcomes. It highlights the importance of rigorous evaluation, impact measurement, and accurate social value assessment to ensure that investments deliver their intended social benefits. The authors discuss the need for enhanced evaluation capacity building within the social investing landscape to move beyond mere financial returns and truly quantify social impact.

This article addresses the conceptual clarity issues surrounding impact investing, including the lack of a uniform definition and interchangeable use of terms like “socially responsible investment.” Through an analysis of academic and practitioner works, it highlights similarities and inconsistencies at definitional, terminological, and strategic levels. The research aims to foster a better understanding of impact investing to advance the field and increase its credibility, particularly regarding the characteristics required of impact investees.

This chapter advocates for a unifying framework for impact assessment in impact investing, addressing the current lack of common language and diverse methodologies. It proposes that the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN)’s characterization of impact investing can serve as a basis for assessing impact along an impact value chain, distinguishing outputs from outcomes and impacts. Such a framework would facilitate comparisons, aggregation, and better managerial decision-making for social purpose organizations.

This article presents a bibliometric analysis to map the landscape of impact investing research. It systematically reviews existing literature to identify key trends, influential authors, institutions, and prevalent themes within the field. The study provides a comprehensive overview of the academic discourse surrounding impact investing, highlighting its evolution, current focus areas, and potential directions for future research. This mapping serves as a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners alike.

This research note investigates impact assessment practices within the French Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) industry. Based on interviews, observation, surveys, and documentary evidence, it contrasts SRI’s motivations for impact assessment with those of impact investing. While SRI aims for sustainable development with financial savvy, impact investing prioritizes demonstrable societal impact. The study reveals significant differences in approaches, creating a distance between the two communities. It identifies who is interested in impact assessment in SRI, why they seek it, and its practical manifestation, suggesting implications for SRI, impact investing, and accounting fields.

This chapter provides a comprehensive review and proposes a research agenda for social impact investing (SII). It analyses existing definitions, financial vehicles like social impact bonds and funds, and the evolving empirical studies in the field. The authors highlight the fragmented nature of current knowledge and aim to synthesize different perspectives to offer new insights into SII. The piece also discusses the tensions and complexities involved in combining social and financial objectives within this investment paradigm.

This paper reflects on the emerging global practice of Social Impact Bonds (SIBs), examining their implementation and effectiveness. It discusses various aspects of social bonds and the critical importance of social impact measurement. The author provides insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with SIBs based on their evolving use across different jurisdictions, contributing to the broader understanding of performance-based social financing.