Paul Brest critiques strategic philanthropy's rigid frameworks that often prioritize metrics and planning over continuous learning and flexibility. He discusses emerging alternatives such as emergent philanthropy, adaptive strategies, and systems thinking as more effective approaches for addressing complex social challenges. The article advocates for a shift away from overly prescriptive models towards more dynamic and responsive methods that can better navigate the unpredictable nature of social change, emphasizing iterative learning and adaptability.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
