Recognising Social Inequality

This article examines the pervasive issue of social inequality by exploring its systemic roots and impacts on marginalized communities. It highlights the urgent need for inclusive policies, equitable resource distribution, and transformative leadership to bridge social gaps. Through case studies and policy critiques, the article calls for targeted interventions that promote justice, inclusivity, and a fair distribution of opportunities in society.

Is Our Ignorance Towards Social Inequalities Killing Our Hopes Of Liberation?

David Menezes, student of PGP in Development Leadership at ISDM
This article has been originally posted on Youth ki Awaaz

While growing up, I always had, more or less, one stream of thinking – especially since I come from a middle-class family that protects its privileges and claims them as products of hard work and education.

There are so many social inequalities we are blind towards – simply because they aren’t a part of our lives. Hopefully, some of these questions will help you think of a world different from the one you’ve been exposed to.

We are living in a world with large and rampant inequalities – ranging from gender to religion to caste and every other unequal form. It is a problem that is not only too real but has also become the norm today.

But, is this norm something that I notice but never feel myself to be a part of? And do I feel the need to own up to a problem that I didn’t cause or start? Am I really willing to sacrifice myself in order to make things right? Can I be the one to stand and say, “I’ll fix what’s not my fight”?

Am I a problem-solver or just a bystander with opinions that are strong yet fickle, with actions never taken?

I used to be a strong advocate of capitalism. I thought that it was right – the idea that there can’t be a ‘not-for-profit’ without a ‘for-profit’ to give it light. Or the ideas that there is no welfare without capital accumulation and that there is no ‘fair distribution’ without income generation. Or the idea that survival will be left only to the fittest – with evolution and extinction wiping out our every weakness.

Are there parts of us we must let go of before we can move forward – not just changing qualities or character flaws, but abandoning the hope that’s already lost?

Is it possible for everyone to always make it to the ‘other side’? With a world that’s moving so quickly, I’m sure that some of us are bound to miss the ride!

Can we hold on to the ropes of fairness with development at the helm? I am still unsure of what progress means, and about which is better – the past or the present.

Are your goals more important than the people that you walk with? Would you sacrifice a person to win the prize, or would you rather forfeit? Would you be content protecting every right but not move forward?

Can you really protect the interests of every single son and daughter?

Can everyone’s liberation happen fast and all at once? Will everyone be liberated? Or will some rise and others fall?

Is saving yourself the goal of your life? Or can you save them all?

Author(s) :

David Menezes

Yes

Get in touch with authors

No ratings yet

Rate this article

Yes

Key topics

Social Justice, Philanthropy and Human Rights

Also found in

Share

Join Our Newsletter

Explore More Articles

Paper / Report

Rethinking Impact: From Metrics to Meaning – Convening Report

How do we move beyond measuring impact as a reporting requirement to using it as a tool for learning, decision-making, and long-term change? This report captures the key discussions, insights, and emerging ideas from Rethinking Impact: From Metrics to Meaning, a convening that brought together funders, practitioners, researchers, evaluators, and development professionals to examine the future of impact measurement in India. Anchored around the launch of the Rural Development Impact Framework (RDIF) and the Development Management–Social Impact Measurement and Management (DM-SIMM) approach, the convening explored how the sector can better understand contribution, centre community perspectives, align funding with the realities of social change, and create measurement practices that support learning over compliance. The report synthesises the conversations, key takeaways, and actions that can help build a more thoughtful and effective approach to understanding impact.
Blog

Development Management: Genesis, Rationale, and the Foundations of an Emerging Discipline

Development Management (DM) arises at a junction that neither development studies nor mainstream management fully occupies on its own. Development thinking has traditionally concerned itself with what change is desirable and for whom, while management thinking has concerned itself with how collective effort gets organised and executed.
Paper / Report

A Methodological Framework for Assessing the Long-Term Impact of a Nonprofit’s Work in a Geography

This report presents the Rural Development Impact Framework (RDIF), a methodological approach for assessing the long-term impact of nonprofit organisations working within a geography. Drawing on realist evaluation, the framework shifts the focus from short-term, project-level attribution to understanding how sustained organisational engagement contributes to social change over time. Using PRADAN’s work in Gumla (Jharkhand) and Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) as case studies, the research combines qualitative, quantitative, and geospatial methods to examine how interventions interact with local contexts to generate change. The study demonstrates that long-term impact emerges through the cumulative strengthening of livelihoods, institutions, collective agency, and governance systems, offering a practical framework for evaluating organisational contribution to rural transformation.
Paper / Report

DM-SIMM: A Funder’s Guide to Reflect, Learn, and Act on Social Impact

Across the social sector, impact measurement is often reduced to reporting numbers, meeting donor requirements, and proving results. In the process, opportunities for learning, adaptation, and meaningful decision-making are frequently lost. This guide explores how funders can rethink Social Impact Measurement and Management (SIMM) to prioritise continuous learning over compliance. Drawing on research, practitioner insights, and real-world examples, it offers practical ways to make measurement more useful, participatory, and responsive to the realities of implementation. The guide highlights the critical role of funders in shaping incentives, creating space for reflection, and enabling organisations to act on evidence. Ultimately, it presents a vision of impact practice that helps organisations learn, adapt, and stay focused on the change they seek to create.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.