Our History Of War Shows How Rigid Ideologies Defeat Us

“ The people of India resolved to constitute India into a Democratic, Republic and to secure to all its citizens ‘Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; Equality of status and opportunity’, and to promote ‘Fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual’. […] The right to freedom of speech and expression, the right to form associations and unions, the right to assemble peaceably and without arms. […] Everyone is entitled to his thoughts and views. There are no barriers….

“ The people of India resolved to constitute India into a Democratic, Republic and to secure to all its citizens ‘Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; Equality of status and opportunity’, and to promote ‘Fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual’. […] The right to freedom of speech and expression, the right to form associations and unions, the right to assemble peaceably and without arms. […] Everyone is entitled to his thoughts and views. There are no barriers. Our Constitution guarantees that.”


The following are parts of the historic judgement delivered by the Supreme Court (SC) in the case of the “State of Madhya Pradesh vs Ramashankar Raghuvanshi” on February 21, 1983. The judgement was delivered by Justice Fazal Ali, who was believed to be a ‘card-carrying communist’. The recipient, a municipal school teacher, Ramashankar Raghuvanshi, had been dismissed by the Madhya Pradesh government in 1974 for having ‘taken part in RSS activities’ – after which he had appealed to the SC.


My awakening from the classes at ISDM concerns the actions based on our ‘isms’ (which indicate the body of principles, practices and ideologies we believe in), in comparision to those based on values we are all born with as human beings (the universal values). I have understood why I shouldn’t take a stand based on my ideology or ‘isms’ – and instead base it on my values. In a way, instead of focussing on ‘what’ to achieve, I need to put my attention on ‘how’ to achieve.


In our day-to-day lives, we all carry certain biases based on our ideologies – and our tendency is to simply go with that initial reasoning and start judging the ‘others’ or the ‘opposites’. In a way, this tendency makes us blind and stops us from listening to and understanding others. The stronger our conservative beliefs, the firmer our convictions – and this is precarious.


We start thinking that the ‘others’ or the ‘opposites’ get what they deserve. We all remember the shocking images of the drowned Syrian boy and those showing the tragic plight of the refugees, or the tragic news of the Rohingya refugees of Myanmar, or news of the assassination of senior journalist Gauri Lankesh – all of which spread on social media. Often, these convictions lead to large-scale devastation. In the late 19th and 20th centuries, we have seen devastation on mammoth scales, based on the maddening fights between ideologies to prove which one is a panacea! One ‘ism’ trying to prove its supremacy over others has often lead to holocausts, mass annihilation, world wars and religious, political, ethnic and cultural fanaticism.


India, on the other hand, through her pillars of democracy and modernity, spoke of a different world view which supported peace and human values. In 1893, at Chicago, Swami Vivekananda proclaimed the message of universal tolerance and internationalism. In “The Story of My Experiments with Truth“, Gandhi pointed out that his path is based on two ideals – ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (search for truth). He also stated that truth is not rigid, fixed or static – it is ever changing. Another pillar of modern India, Rabindranath Tagore, developed the concept of “Viswa Bharati”, which considers the whole universe as a teacher. None of them claimed any ‘ism’. Rather, they spoke of values like oneness, agency, dignity, freedom, equity and fraternity for oneself and others.


Based on my reflections and learning in the past few weeks, I feel that the way forward for us as humanity has to be based on kindness, healing and making peace. I find affirmation in His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s message and words which convey the same thoughts for the world. This can only be achieved by embodying the values of the inner being and their appropriate manifestation in the outside world.


Embodying the values is synonymous to feeling the greatness within oneself. Acceptance of the self is the foremost step towards being more accepting and spreading oneness in the world. We can then accept the same greatness within each human being and recognise that there is no difference between people. We are all made up of the same consciousness and our needs and values are completely similar. Until we do this, we won’t be able to empathise with the ‘other’ and connect with the ‘opposite’.


Empathy is the key to the new world order. Through value-based learning, we can connect deeply to the needs and feelings of the other, empathise and have a dialogue. The future of the earth is critically clinging to this ability for dialogue and making way for peace and harmony, instead of separating and fighting.

Author(s) :

Koushik Hore

Yes

Get in touch with authors

No ratings yet

Rate this article

Yes

Key topics

Youth Development and Leadership

Also found in

Share

Join Our Newsletter

Explore More Articles

Paper / Report

Rethinking Impact: From Metrics to Meaning – Convening Report

How do we move beyond measuring impact as a reporting requirement to using it as a tool for learning, decision-making, and long-term change? This report captures the key discussions, insights, and emerging ideas from Rethinking Impact: From Metrics to Meaning, a convening that brought together funders, practitioners, researchers, evaluators, and development professionals to examine the future of impact measurement in India. Anchored around the launch of the Rural Development Impact Framework (RDIF) and the Development Management–Social Impact Measurement and Management (DM-SIMM) approach, the convening explored how the sector can better understand contribution, centre community perspectives, align funding with the realities of social change, and create measurement practices that support learning over compliance. The report synthesises the conversations, key takeaways, and actions that can help build a more thoughtful and effective approach to understanding impact.
Blog

Development Management: Genesis, Rationale, and the Foundations of an Emerging Discipline

Development Management (DM) arises at a junction that neither development studies nor mainstream management fully occupies on its own. Development thinking has traditionally concerned itself with what change is desirable and for whom, while management thinking has concerned itself with how collective effort gets organised and executed.
Paper / Report

A Methodological Framework for Assessing the Long-Term Impact of a Nonprofit’s Work in a Geography

This report presents the Rural Development Impact Framework (RDIF), a methodological approach for assessing the long-term impact of nonprofit organisations working within a geography. Drawing on realist evaluation, the framework shifts the focus from short-term, project-level attribution to understanding how sustained organisational engagement contributes to social change over time. Using PRADAN’s work in Gumla (Jharkhand) and Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) as case studies, the research combines qualitative, quantitative, and geospatial methods to examine how interventions interact with local contexts to generate change. The study demonstrates that long-term impact emerges through the cumulative strengthening of livelihoods, institutions, collective agency, and governance systems, offering a practical framework for evaluating organisational contribution to rural transformation.
Paper / Report

DM-SIMM: A Funder’s Guide to Reflect, Learn, and Act on Social Impact

Across the social sector, impact measurement is often reduced to reporting numbers, meeting donor requirements, and proving results. In the process, opportunities for learning, adaptation, and meaningful decision-making are frequently lost. This guide explores how funders can rethink Social Impact Measurement and Management (SIMM) to prioritise continuous learning over compliance. Drawing on research, practitioner insights, and real-world examples, it offers practical ways to make measurement more useful, participatory, and responsive to the realities of implementation. The guide highlights the critical role of funders in shaping incentives, creating space for reflection, and enabling organisations to act on evidence. Ultimately, it presents a vision of impact practice that helps organisations learn, adapt, and stay focused on the change they seek to create.
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.