Live Life King Size – What About Living Life Ant Size

This article uses a metaphor comparing “living life king size” to “living life ant size” to discuss the disparities in opportunity and ambition across different societal segments. It examines how resource limitations and systemic challenges can confine potential, while also exploring strategies for overcoming these limitations. The post offers inspirational insights on maximizing impact, regardless of one’s starting point, and calls for inclusive policies that nurture talent at all levels.

Jim Carrey once said, “I wish everyone could get rich and famous and everything they ever dreamed of so they can see that’s not the answer.”

In today’s era, an individual’s identity is not defined by what one does, but by what they own. We end up buying materialistic things to fill a void within us – and continue to do so until the hunger is completely satiated. But, is this hunger really filled up? Are we ever satisfied with what we have? The answer to this is no, since there is a constant need to feel whole, content and superior. Increasingly, materialistic possessions are often used inter-changeably with happiness, merriment and self-sufficiency.

A global research done in the US found out that spending $75,000 a year on material well-being meant greater psychological well-being. But planning past the rough threshold, money doesn’t buy happiness. You can have more money but you are not happier.

Take fashion for example – our closet is full of a wide range of clothes (which change from season to season), an equally wide range of shoes, of accessories and so on. But, do these add value to our lives? Are they truly making us happy?

I fondly remember my grandmother. A simple, contented woman, she used to buy a pair of clothes for two seasons of the year, but things have changed now. Every 57 seconds is equivalent to one year in my grandmother’s time. Advertising and marketing agencies are positioning us in the ‘status system’. In this era of fast fashion, they always want us to feel out of trend. Slashed prices, discounts, reward points create a dopamine effect and you end up purchasing every month. In the concept of fashion, “You don’t sell your old stuff because they are no longer useful. You sell them because they no longer add a social value to your life.”

There’s another side to this story – is our constant mindless consumption causing the degradation of natural habitats around us? Do we question ourselves whether we are paying the true cost of labour, or the environment, we are helping deteriorate?

So, here’s an idea- what about having a minimum consumption? Imagine a life unencumbered by the trappings of the chaotic world around you. What you are imagining is an intentional life – it’s not a perfect or an easy life, but it’s a simple one. You don’t need a palace to live like a king. You just need true happiness to increase life’s grandeur.

As humans, I think we are confused about what makes us happy. So, when I talk about consumption, I am not talking about taking things away. I am not saying that it is wrong to indulge in things. Rather, I am compelling you to question whether all this is making our lives or our environment any better.

Author(s) :

Ravi Jaiswal

Yes

Get in touch with authors

No ratings yet

Rate this article

Yes

Key topics

Social Justice, Philanthropy and Human Rights

Also found in

Share

Join Our Newsletter

Explore More Articles

Case Study

Rooted in Trust, Rising Together

In one of Chennai’s oldest urban settlements, over 3,000 families navigate daily challenges marked by poverty, addiction, and instability. Many children return from school to difficult home environments with limited support. Amidst this, one young woman chose to respond— not with sympathy, but with sustained action. Although Vedika was overjoyed, she was left overwhelmed by the amount of work she was putting in. Fundraising, curriculum, operations, team building, trauma counselling—she was doing everything alone. There was no advisory board. No formal governance structure. Just urgency, heart, and a mounting emotional toll on her.
Event Report

Pune and Mumbai Summary Report: Systems Convening for Philanthropy for Inclusive Development

This report summarises insights from two systems thinking convenings held in Pune and Mumbai in April 2024. Organised by CPID at ISDM, the convenings engaged stakeholders to reflect on challenges and systemic traps in Indian philanthropy, and proposed collaborative, inclusive approaches for sustainable development.
Event Report

Summary Report: Systems Convening for Philanthropy for Inclusive Development.

This report summarises the first systems convening held by CPID at ISDM in September 2023, where funders, SPOs, and PSOs used systems thinking to reflect on philanthropic dilemmas in India. Themes include trust-based philanthropy, flexibility in funding, community participation, and the use of the Iceberg Model to uncover behavioural, institutional, and belief system barriers.
Blog

RBPM- The Missing Piece- Why RBPM is Essential for Social Change

Social change initiatives in India are driven by a collective desire to make a positive difference. Billions of dollars are poured into programs aimed at tackling complex issues like poverty, education, and healthcare. But often, the impact of these programs is difficult to measure, leading to a nagging question: are we truly achieving lasting change?This is where Results-Based Program Management (RBPM) steps in as the missing piece. RBPM is a structured approach that equips program managers with the skills and…
We use essential and analytics cookies to operate this website and understand how visitors interact with it. As this site also functions as a login identity provider (IDP) for other ISDM portals, some cookies are necessary to enable secure authentication. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.